|
|
| Bildiri Özetleri | |
| Ana Sayfaya Dönüş |
| ISD Ana Sayfası |
|
OF THE VINEYARDS IN HADİM - ALADAĞ REGION Fatih Er 1 , Fethi Bayraklı 2 , Mevlüt Mülayim 1 1 Selcuk University Çumra Meslek Yüksekokulu 42500, Çumra - Konya 2 19 Mayıs University Agricultural Faculty Department of Soil Science - Samsun ABSTRACT This study was carried out to determine the problems of vineyards nutrition in Hadim Aladağ region. Soil samples different depths, plant samples at fruit set and veraison period were obtanied from 52 vineyards . Some physical and chemical analysis on soil samples and leaf lamina and petiole were also made. Soil textures were sandy silt, sandy clayey silt , soil was slightly alkaline , poor interms of organic material. 74 % of the soils was medium to high in CaCO3 and 63 % was different interms of phosphorus. Plant samples had sufficient Mn and Cu . These values in plant samples were 65.4 , 65 and 27 % for Zn , B and Cu. From fruit set to veraison Fe and Mn increased B decrased and there wasn't a trend with respect to Zn and Cu. INRTRODUCTION Anatolia has vine of culture. It is home Anatolia about economical. Beside this, it has got a vineyard of culture. The vineyard was been subject to legend in Anatolia and it has got an important place in the life of person and it is important for their health It is nutritious The vineyard was examined carefully about climate soil and places of consumption. Some technique ways were improved about climate for vineyard and the consumption was agumented (Brohi,1984). The vineyard is 37, 926, and its consumption is 117.132 t in city of Konya. This vineyard has got a place about 6,7 % and 3,2 % of Turkey. The consumption of the wet grapes is about 600 kg in Turkey, and 308,80 kg/da in Konya. But in Hadim-Aladağ is about 239,40 kg/da (Anonymous, 1994). The vine soil of Hesapali grow grape hasn't got enough phosphorus and it is Average of calcareous and it has must be phosphorus about 40%( Bayraklı et.al, 1997). We must make use of the plants and the soil for grow the plants. Beside this , we must appraise from exchangeables to grow the plants.In our and in the world a lot of works were made about the soil analysis, a specialy the trees which are pouring leaf trees. MATERIALS and METHODS In Hadim-Aladağ is a narrow valley between the Average Tourus Mountains and it is through the Göksu lake. The altitude is down on the valley floor about 700m. In here, warm is about 30,5 OC from the langer-years, in July. But it can be -13,6oC in January. The Average warm is 9,2OC and the wet is 59,7% and rain quantity is 615mm in a year. In the searching place, many pictures were taken about the soil at fruit set in the 0-30 and 30-60 cm in the soil (Table 1). Soil textures were sandy silt, sandy clayey silt , soil was slightly alkaline , poor interms of organic material. % 74 of the soils was medium to high in CaCO3 and % 63 was different interms of phosphorus ( Table 1 ). We can take this pictures from 52 vineyard. From the same vineyard fruit set and veraison (Porro et.al, 1995). It was taken examples the plants as leaf lamina (Beyers, 1962 and the leaf petiol (Christensen, 1984). The searching vineyards were taken from "Hesapali , S. Dimrit, Keçimen, Göğüzüm, Bardas" as be different grapes (Bouycous ,1951). 1: 2,5 we can understand the soil-water pH and whole salt (Bayraklı 1987) and calcareous scheibler calsimetres from the soil examples.With the phosphorus metod, Mg, Ca, Na quantity can learn from (Sağlam, 1978).  The plants examples were ready with clean , dry and crush analysis. The crush examples of H2SO4+H2O2 with the other exchangeables were supplied. Fe , Zn , Mn , Cu , GBC 902 A.A.S. with dry matter as ppm(mg.kg-1) search (Bayraklı 1987) B and Azomethin-H methot were give UV-160 A. The results were moden as dry matter ppm (mg.kg-1) (Bayraklı 1987). E.Ü. Tarist packet program was used as statistics analysis. DISCUSSION We can see in term of fruit set and veraison Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu , and B in the leaf lamina and petiol, which are at the 3 and 2 Table. From the searchig vineyards, the leaf lamina and petiol is changing about Fe, 19,76 - 170,47 & 23,30-95,00 ppm Fe (Average 84,11& 56,68 ppm) in the fruit set 55,59-195,78 & 10,30-175,00 ppm (Average 139,29 & 77,13ppm) in the veraison (Table 2 and 3). The Fe's value was saved as the time. This save can develop from root. Although, Kacar (1984) in the plants this save can fall down, but as fixed. The Fe, absorb in the root as Fe+2 and Fe. The Fe of the plants is fall down with pH and phosphorus and Calcium. Beside this the Fe can't find in the plants organ. But the Fe is very important for grapes. Because itis growing with Fe. We must give Fe for bad grapes, and it is becoming wonderful grapes (Kabala-pendias and Pendias 1984).  Beside this the Fe is rising in the plants towards the time of veraison. We can see this same result in the other exchangeables ( Ergenoğlu and Erdoğan 1992). The Fe isn't enough for the examples leaf lamina in the of fruit set. It was explained by Beyers (1962) and (60-18ppm Fe ) or 27% and explained by Porro et.al,(1995) (45ppm Fe) or 19%. In the other way; we can see the quatity as 12.5%.This result is the same with leaf lamina time. As a result, Porro et.al, (1995) was explained the Fe is very important for the plants in the time of take the pictures and examples plants. From the examples value of Zn time of leaf lamina and leaf petiol time of fruit set is 4,75-83,18ppm. Zn (Average of 31,84 ppm ) time of veraison is 2,23-103,60ppm. Zn (Average of 21,71 ppm ) we can see this values. Zn of leaf lamina can seen change or it is less. Because of copperly preparat which is in the vineyard. When it is used, you can make use of antogonistik of Zn. The Zn volue of vine can change, this exchangeable was explained by Cummings (1977) & Aktaş and Karaçal(1988). From this exchangeable we can understand that the Zn is too much in the leaf petiol than leaf lamina. The fruit set, the volue of Zn is 35ppm in the leaf lamina. It was explained by Alexander and Woodhom (1964). Beside this Zn isn't enogh for vine, it is too less (60%) All the searchers can explain less of Zn for soil (65,4%) or plants (69,2%) But this results are the same for these.Volue of Mn time of leaf lamina is 28,90-211,40ppm Mn (Average of 115,78ppm ) time of verasion is 38,40-233,74ppm Mn (Average of 144,86ppm ) this values can change. The volue of Mn can change to words to veraison. We can understan this from search which was explained by Aktaş and Karaçal (1988) and Erenoğlu and Erdoğan (1992) This volue (22ppm Mn) is enough for plants and was explained it (Christensen,1984). If the Mn is too much in the plants, the plants can saved by Mn or fungusid. But this exchangeable isn't real it is guess. Although this volue is enough for plants and vine, the plants were bad. Aspecially time of leaf petiol. This event is born from the Fe/Mn. Beside thiss a micro is useful for plants which is in the soil (Aydemir and Köleli 1994).  Cu is use full for plants and its value is 5,53-29,52ppm (Average of 16,66ppm) time of veraison is 3,05-19,28ppm Cu (Average of 11,23ppm) The value of Cu can less or too much time of leaf lamina and term colour . The value of Cu is lessing time of leaf lamina, but it is too much time of leaf petiol. In the plants 13% value need Cu and in the soil is 7%. From the searching vineyards, the leaf lamina and leaf petiol is changing about B 29,75-105,80 & 19,80- 59,80 ppm (Average of 53,68 & 34,43 ppm ) in the fruit set. 25,12 - 74,60& 18,30-42,00 ppm B (Average of 46,11 & 29,26 ppm) in the veraison. ( Table 2 and 3 ). The B is leaf lamina than leaf petiol. In the vineyards the value of B is less towards to veraison. This is explained by (Porro et.al, 1995). In the time of leaf lamina an the B is too much , it was explained by Chsirtensen (1984) and (45ppm) and the value is 57,7% not enough for plants. Beside this, 62,5% value is enough for plants and vine or soil. We can see this results the examles of plants. Examples of soil organic material is 0-30cm in depth of soils. Beside this we can see Fe in the soils about (p <0,01 ) and this is positive. This is first depth. But second depth is important (p <0,05) and positive. Fe is increasing with this the organic material are incresing too. This exchangeable was explained by (Saatçı et.al,1980).In the second depth , we can see this exchangeable between K and P, (p <0,01) and positive , Ca+Mg/K is important , (P<0,05) and negative. Between organic material and exchangeable K which is important was explained by Atalay (1987 a,b) and Sezen (1975). But P was explained by ( Mengel, 1988). In the soil's depth P and Zn is important, too (p<0,01) and negative. This infomation is the same with P-Zn which was exolained by; Beside this , between P and Cu is important (p<0,05) and negative. But P is abstacling the P-Zn is and Fe - Cu. This is explained by (Brohi et.al, 1994). In the soil is Cu is the same with clay which is in the soil. And this is impotant in second depth. (p<0,05) and positive. Between organic material and Cu can make of useful for plants about (p<0,01) and positive. This was explained by Loneragan (1981) and Bayraklı and Gezgin (1991). Between Zn and organic material is important (p<0,05) and positive. We can see the same similar in plain of Gediz, by Atalay (1987 a,b) who was explained. The leaf lamina and Fe, the leaf lamina and Cu , there is a similar between them and it was explained ( p<0,05) and positive ; we can see this example at grow cucumber . The leaf lamina and Zn, there is a similar between them , and there is a similar between leaf lamina and B (p<0,05) and negative. In the leaf lamina the Zn is increasing and B is lessing. This similar was explained by Singh and ark. (1990). This exchangeable is the same between B and wheat. The leaf and Fe, the leaf and Zn, there is a similar between them. Between Fe and Zn was explained about value of them. When the corn's began to Grow, the p is lessing with Zn, this was explained by ;the leaf lamina and Fe with leaf lamina and B is similar.Was explained it Fe which is lessing not simlar B and Mn ( Çelebi and Yalçın,1990). The salt can change with leaf lamina and Fe and K (p<0,05) and positive. In second depth the lime is (r = 0,339*) , whale salti is (r = 0,358**) and K (r=0,359**) The P is very important for pants for increase Fe (Brohi et.al, 1994). Jolley and ark. (1988) Fe is very important too for plants , a Specially tomatoes and soybean. We can see this exchangeable in the examples which were explained tomatoes and soybean examples. Both first and second depth, the leaf lamina, there is a similar between P and Zn are important (p<0,05) and negative. P is need for grow the plants and beside this Zn . Between B and the leaf lamina in the soil depth about 0-30 cm, and with cu. The leaf lamina is (rB-Cu = -0,437**). Beside this (p <0,05) and positive and 30-60cm in soil depth and (p<0,01) and positive. The similars were explained by (El Sheik et.al, 1971). Beside this pH and Ca is not important for vine , B is enough. In the soil the clay is increasing , the Mn is lessing. (p<0,05) We can see this exchangeable in Bursa in garden which is peach garden (Katkat et.al, 1994). In the soil and between B and leaf petiol is important (p<0,05) and negative, ıt was explained by Keren and Bingham (1985) PH is increasing and it is lessing the B about 6,5. The clay is much important than the organic material. The some similar was explained by Sözüdoğru et.al, (1996) and Marzadori et.al, (1991). The leaf lamina can taken with B by the plants about (p<0,01) and positive. But B's value is changing in the soil of sand. It is changing.So B is important and its value is important for the plants and for the soils. It was explained by (El-sheik et.al, 1971). REFERENCES Aktaş, M. ve Karaçal, İ. (1988). Kırıkkale ve Delice ilçelerinde Hasandede Çeşidi Üzüm çeşitlerinin Bitki Besin Kapsam durumu. Doğa TU. Tarım ve Ormancılık dergisi, 12:3, 291-304. Alexander,D.McE., and Woodham, R.C.(1964).Yield Responses by Sultanas to Application of Zn and Superphosphate. Austrailan J. of Expt. Agric. and Animal Husbandary, 4, 169-172. Anonymous. (1994) Türkiye İstatistik Yıllığı. T.C. Başbakanlık D.İ.E. Ankara Atalay, İ.Z. (1987) a. Gediz Havzası Kolüvyal Topraklarının Besin Element Durumu ve Bunların Bazı Toprak Özellikleri. E.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. Cilt:24, Sayı:1, 161-174, İzmir. Atalay, İ.Z. (1987) b. Gediz Havzası Alüvyal Topraklarının Besin Element Durumu ve Bunların Bazı Toprak Özellikleri. E.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. Cilt:24, Sayı:1, 61-74, İzmir. Aydemir, O. ve Köleli, N. (1994). Mikro besin elementleri Arasındaki ilişkiler ( derleme) Atatürk Üni. Ziraat Fak. 25, (3) ,469-478.Erzurum. Bayraklı, F. ve Gezgin, S. (1991). Konya. Ereğli ve Çumra Ovası Topraklarının Elverişli Fe, Zn, Mn ve Cu Miktarları ile Bazı Toprak Özellikleri Arasındaki İlişkiler Üzerine Bir Araştırma. S.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 1 (2): 99-110. Bayraklı, F., (1987) Toprak ve Bitki Analizleri (Çeviri ve Derleme) 19 Mayıs Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi., No:17, Samsun. Bayraklı, F., Er, F. and Brohi, A.R.( 1997). Determination of Nutritional Status Vine-Yards Grown in Hadim Aladağ Part of Konya Region.XXVII th Annual Meeting of ESNA / jointly Organised with UIR.August 29- September 2,61-66 sf., Gehnt, Belgium. Beyers, E. (1962) Diagnostic leaf anaysis for deciduous fruit. South African Journal of Agricultural Science, 5: No:2, 315-319. Bouyoucos, G.J. (1951). A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils Agronomy Jovr. 43: 434-438. Brohi, A.R. (1984). Bağcılıkta gübrelemenin önemi, Tokat Bağcılığı Sempozyumu, C.Ü.Z.F., Tokat. Brohi, A.R.,Aydeniz, A., Karaman, M.R. ve Erşahin, S. (1994) Bitki Besleme. G.O.P.Ü. Ziraat Fak.Yay.:4, Kitap Serisi : 4 ,230 sf Tokat. Christensen, P. (1984). Nutrient Level comparisons of leaf Petioles and Blades in Twenty-Six Grape Cultivars Over Three Years (1979 through 1981). Am. J. Enol. Vitic., Vol. 35, No:3, 124-133. Cummings, G.A. (1977) Variaton in the Concentration of certain Elements in Muscadine Grape Leaves Relatedto Season , Leaf Portion and Age. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. ,68, 141-156. Çelebi, G. ve Yalçın, S.R. (1990). Demir uygulamasının mısır bitkisinde gelişme ile demir, çinko, mangan ve bor kapsamları üzerine etkisi, A.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yıllığı. Cilt: 41, No: 1-2, 225-239, Ankara. El-Sheik, A.M. Ulrich,A. Awad, S.K. and Mawardy, A.E. (1971).Boron Tolorance of squash, melon, cucumber and corn. J.Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.,96: 536-537. Ergenoğlu, F. ve Erdoğan, M. (1992). Çukurovası Bölgesinde Bazı Yerli ve Yabancı Kökenli Asma Çeşitlerinde Bitki Besin Maddelerinin Durumu. Doğa-Tr.J. of Agriculture and Forestry 16, 200-211 sf. Ankara. Jolley, V.D., Brown,J.C.,Blaylock,M.J. and Miller, G. (1988) A role for Potassium in the use of iron by plants, J. Plant Nutr. 11: 1159-1175. Kabala-Pendias,A.and Pendias, H.(1984).Trace element in soils and plants.CRC Press, Boca Raton,FL Kacar, B. (1984). Bitki Beslenme A.Ü. Yay. No:899. Ders Kitabı:250, 304 sf. Ankara. Katkat, A.V. Özgümüş, A., Başar, H. ve Altınel, B. (1994). Bursa yöresindeki Şeftali Ağaçlarının Demir Çinko, Bakır ve Mangan ile Beslenme Durumları. Tr.J. of Agricultural and Forestry 18: 447-456. Keren, R. and Bingham, F.T. (1985). Boron in Water, soils and plants, Adv. Soil Sci. 1: 229-276. Loneragan, J.F. (1981). Copper in Soils and Plants. Academic Preess. 70 s., New york. Marzadori, C., Vittori, Antisari, L., Gavatta, C. and Segui, P. (1991) Soil Organik Matter İnflunce on adsorption and desorption of boron. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55: 1582-1585. Mengel, K. (1988). Bitkinin Beslenmesi ve Metabolizması (Çeviri). Ç.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi. Yay:162 Ders Kitabı:12. Ankara. Porro, D., Stefanini, M., Failla, O. and Stringari, G. (1995). Optimal leaf sampling time in diagnosis of grapevine nutritional Status. Acta Horticulturae 383; 135-142, İtaly. Saatçi, F., Altınbaş, Ü. ve Taysun, A. (1980). İzmir İli Gümüşsu Ovası sulama sularının nitelikleri ile toprak özellikleri ve mandarin yaprakları mikroelement içeriği arasındaki ilişkiler üzerine bir araştırma. E.Ü. Zir. Fak. Yayınları No: 396. İzmir. Sağlam, M.T. (1978). Toprak Kimyası Tatbikat Notları.,154 sf. Erzurum. Sezen, Y. (1975). Doğu Anadolu'nun Değişik Yerlerinden Alınan Toprak Örneklerinin Bitkiye Yarayışlı Potasyum Sağlama Durumları üzerine Bir Araştırma. A.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları. No:195, Erzurum. Singh, J.P., Dahiya, D.J. and Narwal, R.P., (1990). Boron uptake an toxicity in wheat in relation to zine supply. Fert. Res. 24, 105-110. Sözüdoğru, S., Omar, Satea, M., ve Usta, S. (1996). Topraklarda Bor Adsorpsiyonu. A.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. 2 (1): 19-22. |